Lucic your classification of the 2004 teams is to me a proof that you have a personal thing going with the Royals. Everytime people talked to me about you and your comments I tried to stay neutral. To be honest I didn't know what to clearly think of you. It was impossible in my mind that a father of a 7 year old would enter a war of words and try to lower other kids and other teams to make sure everybody knew his son was that good.
I've seen a lot of kids like you did and yes your son is very gifted and can dominate at the level he's playing right now. He's like a horse on the ice and when he has the puck you can feel everybody expects something to happen. You have other good players in your team as well and, like you did in St-hubert, you coach to win. You don't think of what others would think of you cutting your bench and letting 7 year old kids on the bench to make sure you win. Nobody can argue with you this is AAA after all !!! lol
As for the royals, I don't believe you see them as a not that good of a team. I think we have real top forwards in our team. Yes there is room for improvement but I think that's why they still have 11 years to learn and enjoy hockey at the minor level.
I think I almost made up my mind about you but I'm willing to, once again, wait a little bit more to see if you are a class act parent that knows his hockey or just an idiot !
so my classification of the 2004 teams is :
1- Stallions with 3 tournaments won
2-royals with 2 tournaments won and a lost in OVERTIME
the other teams are all good but 2 teams won the 5 tournaments.
