Aller au contenu
stallions2004

Brick 2014

Messages recommandés

Sutter concedes Canada is failing at grassroots level

After Canada fails to medal at back-to-back world juniors

 

1297198595393_AUTHOR_PHOTO.jpg?quality=8
By Terry Koshan ,Toronto Sun

First posted:

 

Sunday, January 05, 2014 05:20 PM EST

| Updated:

Monday, January 06, 2014 07:49 AM EST
1297510632009_ORIGINAL.jpg?quality=80&siCanada's head coach Brent Sutter directs his team against Germany during the second period of their IIHF World Junior Championship ice hockey game in Malmo, Sweden, December 26, 2013. (REUTERS)

 

 

MALMO, SWEDEN - Brent Sutter has coached Canada in three world junior championships.

And from his spot behind the bench, Sutter has taken notes. Plenty, to be sure.

Is Canada getting it done at the grassroots level across the nation, in minor hockey?

In a word — or in Sutter’s case, several — no.

“There’s too much focus on winning and losing at such a young age,” said Sutter, who also has a keen eye from his perch as owner, general manager and coach of the Red Deer Rebels of the Western Hockey League.

“And not enough about the skill part of it. That’s truly where it starts. At 16, 17 when they hit the Canadian Hockey League, there should already be a standard of skill already in place.

“I think there are times there is too much focus on winning and losing hockey games and Xs and Os at a young age and not enough on developing the skill sets.”

Sutter takes his cue from the world junior, where Canada has failed to win gold for five years in a row. And for the first time since Hockey Canada began its Program of Excellence in 1982, Canada was denied a medal in consecutive years.

That became fact on Sunday with a 2-1 loss against Russia in the bronze-medal game. Finland, meanwhile, shocked host Sweden 3-2 in overtime on a goal by Buffalo Sabres prospect Rasmus Ristolainen.

Last winter in Ufa, Russia, the hosts defeated Canada 6-5 in overtime to take bronze.

“When you’re at this level and you see certain things ... how can we get better?” Sutter said. “That’s got to come from top to bottom.

“We do a great job, but where are the areas we can be better?

“That’s my feelings. There are probably a million people out there thinking I’m full of crap. That’s fine. When you’re in this, you see it first-hand. You see where the skill-sets are in some of these other countries, the speed of the game they play at.

“It’s pretty astonishing how some of these teams have grown in that area.”

Sutter was asked whether he thinks the CHL should ban the import draft because it has a hand in developing European players, including some who have had significant roles for their respective countries in the world junior. A CHL ban on drafting import goaltenders will go into full effect this year. CHL clubs are allowed two imports.

“The import draft is great for our league,” Sutter said. “It adds skill to our league. A lot of those European players that come to our league are top-end players. But development starts at peewee age, at bantam age, at 10 years of age.

“It’s about developing your skills, your skating. You see how some of these teams in Europe have done a remarkable job with that. We have to evaluate that.”

Sutter took into consideration that Canada didn’t have four eligible players because they are in the NHL — Morgan Rielly, Nathan MacKinnon, Sean Monahan and Tom Wilson. But other countries this winter also didn’t get players because they were in the NHL.

And it should also be remembered that Canada is not getting blown out of the water at the world junior. The two fourth-place finishes come after a 14-year run of winning a medal. Any other country would love that kind of track record.

Hockey Canada senior director of hockey operations Scott Salmond doesn’t foresee a day when Canada adopts a system similar to that in the United States, where the country’s best under-17 and under-18 players head to Ann Arbor, Mich., to learn under the national team development program.

“The reason other countries have programs like that is because they don’t have the infrastructure we have and I’m not even sure that is the best way,” Salmond said. “One thing we have that other countries don’t have is the Canadian Hockey League.

“We have to be better in the time we have those players. I think the partnership is good and we are working together to make sure our national teams have played an important role in junior hockey in the country.”

Like Sutter, Salmond, of course, can’t help but see the clear ways hockey has become a global sport at the world-junior level.

“There are a lot of good teams that spend a lot of time together,” Salmond said. “You can see in their structure and in the way they play. We need to find ways for our best players to play together more often.”

Partager ce message


Lien à poster

Facile à dire après...

 

Commencer-donc par localiser le TALENT en bas âge avant de vouloir développer des joueurs/gardiens pour l'élite canadienne. À développer n'importe quoi, on obtient n'importe quoi; c'est pas sorcier. 

Partager ce message


Lien à poster

Top Ice YOU NEED to understand I'm not the one who said that, do I agree with that? of course not, but that's not you nor me to answer that question, you need to direct that question to the organizers of the Ice Storm.

 

I'm giving you the Philosophy of the ICE STORM organizers, if your kid doesn't want to go well there's 3 others that are willing to take his place!

 

That's their Philosophy because they know that even if someone complains it doesn't matter they always have kids to replace and have THE AMAZING EXPERIENCE of a 10 year old.

 

That my friend is History 

Partager ce message


Lien à poster

LUCIC, after reading some of your post, you (personnaly) did not like your experience, if you had the chance to do it again, would you go?

Partager ce message


Lien à poster

I just want people to understand the philosophy of the I.S is plain and simple, "it's the experience for your kid just to be there",....that's what I was told and you know what they are right, they never said we were going there to win!!!!the expectations came from the parents, and yes I was the first one to think that way, " to win".

 

So you realy think we engaged thousand of dollars, traveled thousand of miles in this venture being told "we go there for the experience for your child" ?? Well that is goofy at best. We were into this venture because we were told by the I.S. the brick tournament was the best hockey tournament in north america for a 10 year old and that our kids would live a super experience and get some of the best hockey training available, therefore increasing skills and hockey knowledge in general....well guess what, worst ever experience my son ever experienced plane and simple. First of all, the team was lodging in 3-4 different hotel and some "super dad" decided a condo was better for them and took their kids with them....works super trying to install a team spirit!!!

Second, only one meal all together in 10 days.

Third, 0 team activities what so ever, 0 "things to do" , and coaching staff staying by themselves in a "gross" hotel...the worst you can find in Edmonton.

Fourth, no email or phone number to get a hold of any I.S. agent.

I can go on and on but i think you get my point....

In résumé, kids that compete at this level are winners and not loosers, they have a much better "tournament experience" when they win or at least be competitive, just like any real competitors. unless something change within the I.S. management, i would never encourage anybody to invest any time and effort trying to make this team, you will be realy disapointed....make sure coaching staff is qualified as kids of this age gives everything to this person because they trust adults to make wise choices for them.

Partager ce message


Lien à poster

If you're going to spend $5,000 dollars the hockey, environment and experience better be excellent. Let's be honest the Montreal Brick team has been brutal the last couple of seasons and is in danger of losing its licence.

Partager ce message


Lien à poster

If you're going to spend $5,000 dollars the hockey, environment and experience better be excellent. Let's be honest the Montreal Brick team has been brutal the last couple of seasons and is in danger of losing its licence.

5000$....what are you talking about? 1900$ team fees, airplane ticket 3100$ (family of 5), 2600$ hotel, 3000$ meals, 3500$ tryout,practice, tourneys(including airfare,hotels,fuel,meals).....so it is more like 13000$ ...that is also contributing to the bad taste in my mouth....all that knowing we were going there as spectators?? Command.

Partager ce message


Lien à poster

Carey Price là indiqué. Il doit y avoir de l'organisation, soit des campagnes de financement, des commanditaires, des coachs permanents et l'implication jour après jour de la part de l'organisation.

Bref le Brick Team (Québec) est pour tous les parents fortunés qui veulent faire un voyage de hockey à Edmonton !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

13 000$ , je suis assommer!!!!!!

Partager ce message


Lien à poster

Surement plussss 6-7000$ mais c beaucoup$$$ pour des jeunnnnnnnes de 10ans

Mais si ils peuvent payer pas de trouble $$$$$$$$$$ qui décide !!!!

Partager ce message


Lien à poster

Veuillez vous connecter pour commenter

Vous pourrez laisser un commentaire après vous êtes connecté.



Connectez-vous maintenant

×